Is my lawyer doing a bad job, or is this just how it goes?

Almost everybody asking this is really asking one question: is the quiet normal? Sometimes it is. The test that separates the two is not how long your case is taking — it is whether anyone will tell you where it stands.

Tell us about your case

or call 1-866-568-4913

Search this and you get the same list on twenty different pages. Poor communication. No updates. Missed deadlines. All true, and none of it answers the question you actually have, which is whether your case being quiet for three months means something is wrong.

First: the things that make a case slow and mean nothing

A personal injury claim has long stretches where nothing visible happens and nothing is wrong. If you do not know that, every one of those stretches feels like neglect.

• You are still treating. Until your treatment finishes or reaches a plateau, nobody — not your lawyer, not the adjuster — knows what the claim is worth. Settling before then means guessing at your own medical bills. A case that sits while you finish physical therapy is a case being handled correctly.
• Records are being collected. Hospitals and clinics answer records requests on their own schedule. Weeks is ordinary. A chased request that still takes a month is not a sign of a lazy firm.
• The demand is out and the insurer has not answered. This is dead air by design. The adjuster is not waiting on your lawyer; your lawyer is waiting on the adjuster.
• Litigation has its own clock. Once a suit is filed, discovery, depositions and court availability set the pace, and none of the three belongs to your firm.

None of this excuses nobody telling you which of them you are in. That is the distinction the whole page rests on.

Second: the thing that is not normal

Being kept informed is a rule, not a courtesy. Rule 4-1.4(a)(3) requires a lawyer to keep the client reasonably informed about the status of the matter, and (a)(4) to promptly comply with reasonable requests for information.

The Comment is the part almost nobody quotes, and it is the one that settles most of these situations:

“If a prompt response is not feasible, the lawyer, or a member of the lawyer’s staff, should acknowledge receipt of the request and advise the client when a response may be expected.”

Comment to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-1.4

Read that against your own experience. The rule does not promise you an answer the same day. It does not promise your case moves faster. What it says is that a reasonable question gets acknowledged, and you get told when an answer is coming. A firm that cannot manage that is not busy. It is not meeting the standard.

So the test is not “has my case taken a long time.” It is: when I ask a reasonable question, does anyone answer, or at least tell me when they will? A case that takes two years with a firm that returns your calls is being handled. A case that takes four months with a firm that will not pick up is a problem, and the four months is not the problem.

Third: when it is more than communication

Two other rules carry the rest of it, and they are short enough to read whole.

Rule 4-1.1: A lawyer must provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal knowledge, skill, thoroughness, and preparation reasonably necessary for the representation.

Rule 4-1.3: A lawyer shall act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client.

The Comment to 4-1.3 is unusually direct about delay:

“Perhaps no professional shortcoming is more widely resented than procrastination. A client’s interests often can be adversely affected by the passage of time or the change of conditions; in extreme instances, as when a lawyer overlooks a statute of limitations, the client’s legal position may be destroyed. Even when the client’s interests are not affected in substance, however, unreasonable delay can cause a client needless anxiety and undermine confidence in the lawyer.”

Comment to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-1.3

Two things in there are worth sitting with. The Bar names the worst case outright — a missed limitations deadline destroys the claim. And it treats “needless anxiety and undermined confidence” as a real cost of delay, not as the client being difficult. If you have felt unreasonable for being worried, the rule does not agree with you.

The same Comment also says a lawyer’s workload must be controlled so that each matter can be handled competently. A firm that signed more cases than it can work is not an explanation. It is the thing the rule is about.

Sorting your own situation

A realistic example

This is an illustration, not a real case. Someone is rear-ended in March, treats through July, and hears nothing from the firm from April to August. In August she is told the demand went out in July and the adjuster has not responded.

Nothing in the handling was wrong. The case genuinely could not be valued until treatment finished, and the demand went out when it should have. What was wrong was four months of silence that a two-line email in April would have fixed — and the silence is what made her start searching whether her lawyer was bad. By the time she asked, she had spent a summer assuming the worst about a case that was on track.

That is the common version of this. Not malpractice. Not a great firm either.

What to do, in order

1. Ask in writing, and date it. Email, short, to the attorney and to the firm’s general address. Say what you are asking for, give a reasonable deadline — a week is reasonable — and cite Rule 4-1.4(a)(4) and the Comment’s line about acknowledging receipt. Email beats a phone call here precisely because it exists afterwards.
2. Ask for the supervising attorney. If you have only ever spoken to staff, ask by name for the lawyer responsible for your file. You are entitled to that under the Statement of Client’s Rights you signed.
3. Call ACAP. The Florida Bar’s Attorney Consumer Assistance Program, 1-866-352-0707, exists for exactly this conversation. It is not a complaint, it is not adversarial, and it very often resolves things informally. Most people have never heard of it.
4. Get a second opinion. You can do this without telling your firm and without ending anything. The next section is the whole of why.

You are allowed to ask another lawyer — and it stays private

This is the part that stops people, so here it is plainly. Rule 4-4.2 keeps a lawyer from contacting someone who is already represented. People read that and conclude they are sealed off. The Comment says the opposite:

“Nor does this rule preclude communication with a represented person who is seeking advice from a lawyer who is not otherwise representing a client in the matter.”

Comment to Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 4-4.2

The rule protects you from other lawyers approaching you. It does not stop you walking into someone else’s office and asking. A consultation is confidential, it is not a termination, and your current firm is not told about it by anyone — not by the lawyer you consult, and not by this service.

If what you learn is that your case is on track, you have your answer and you have lost nothing. If it is not on track, the stage your case is at is what decides how easily you can move, and that gets harder the longer you sit with it.

What it costs to be wrong in either direction

Leaving a firm that was doing fine costs you a handover and some time. Staying with a firm that is not working your case can cost you the claim, and the deadline on a Florida negligence claim does not pause while you wait to feel certain.

That asymmetry is the argument for finding out. Not for switching — for finding out. And one fee does not become two if you do move, which removes the other reason people stay put.

Common questions

How long is too long without hearing from my lawyer?

The rule sets no number of days. The test is whether the request was reasonable and the response prompt. In practice, a reasonable question that goes unanswered and unacknowledged for one to two weeks is the point to put it in writing and cite Rule 4-1.4(a)(4). The Comment says that if a prompt response is not feasible, the lawyer or a staff member should acknowledge receipt and say when an answer is coming — so silence, rather than delay, is the thing that fails the standard.

Is it normal for a personal injury case to take a year or more?

Yes, frequently. Treatment has to finish before the claim can be valued, records take weeks to arrive, and once a suit is filed the court's calendar sets the pace. Length on its own tells you very little. Whether anyone will explain the delay tells you a lot.

Is my lawyer allowed to never speak to me personally?

Delegating work to staff is normal and permitted. Being unable to reach any attorney at all is different. The Statement of Client's Rights you signed with a contingency fee agreement gives you the right to speak with the attorneys handling your case, and Rule 4-5.3(b) makes the firm responsible for the conduct of its nonlawyer staff.

What is ACAP and should I call it?

The Attorney Consumer Assistance Program is the Florida Bar's line for exactly this kind of question — 1-866-352-0707. It is not the same as filing a grievance. Most calls are about communication problems and many are resolved informally without anything formal ever being opened.

Will my lawyer find out if I talk to another attorney?

Not from the lawyer you consult. A consultation is confidential and it is not a termination. The Comment to Rule 4-4.2 says the rule does not preclude a represented person from seeking advice from a lawyer who is not otherwise involved in the matter. This service does not contact your current firm at any point either.

My lawyer wants me to accept an offer I think is too low. Is that a bad lawyer?

Not by itself — a lawyer is supposed to give you their honest read, and sometimes the honest read is that the offer is good. What matters is whether they can explain how the number relates to your medical specials, the available coverage and the fault picture. An offer you cannot get explained is worth a second opinion before you answer it.

Can I get my case file to show another attorney?

Yes. Rule 4-1.16(d) requires a lawyer, on termination, to surrender papers and property to which the client is entitled, and in practice you can ask for a copy at any time. The same subdivision lets the lawyer retain materials to the extent permitted by law, which is the part most pages leave out. In a switch, the incoming firm normally handles the request rather than leaving it to you.

What if my lawyer actually missed a deadline?

That is the one on this page to act on immediately rather than think about. Get your file and speak to another attorney now. A missed limitations deadline is the example the Comment to Rule 4-1.3 itself gives for how a client's legal position can be destroyed, and the remedies that may exist are time-sensitive in their own right.